My only gripe is that I think the "+16" should have been slightly different. I won't post why, since it is so early, and that might be an extra hint that is not desired to be given just yet.
[9] By "solving" a cube, I get the meaning that you manipulate the sides by various twists to complete it. This puzzle could be solved just as well by taking the cube apart and reassembling it in the final position. That's what I meant by my comment in [7]
Wow, definitely not too easy, but nothing too mysterious, just necessary persistence. I hope this doesn't cause a permanent mutation of my brain!
Nice puzzle m-doc!
Wow...4 days later, and number 89. Nice puzzle, but the hard part for me was figuring out what to do with the numbers since, well, there's like a babillion ways of using numbers like that.
26 Comments
heatherlouwho
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:05 PM |
So, Dr. Rubik. My old nemesis! We meet again!
Tahnan
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:10 PM |
Hm, 8 minutes and 9 seconds, and 11th to finish. Which means I have to give this a 10. :-)
QurqirishDragon
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:19 PM |
Took a bit of work, but definitely a good puzzle.
My only gripe is that I think the "+16" should have been slightly different. I won't post why, since it is so early, and that might be an extra hint that is not desired to be given just yet.
mnemonica
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:33 PM |
Edit: Done, but with an assist. (Thanks for the help!)
entropy
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:28 PM |
Excellent puzzle as always Doc!
Erich
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:30 PM |
Very nice.
QurqirishDragon
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:32 PM |
[4] You don't need to solve the cube in your head, but knowing what a solved cube looks like will help.
soccer_ref
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:36 PM |
Oh, Rubik's Cube is just torture! I can do it, but it's still torture.
must67
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:49 PM |
[7]I can't see how you can answer this without solving. But since I haven't solved it?
QurqirishDragon
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 07:55 PM |
[9] By "solving" a cube, I get the meaning that you manipulate the sides by various twists to complete it. This puzzle could be solved just as well by taking the cube apart and reassembling it in the final position. That's what I meant by my comment in [7]
brainybroad
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 08:19 PM |
x
must67
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 08:09 PM |
[9]If you knew what order to assemble them in that would work. Since you don't you must solve at least the yellow face to know the correct order.
[8]I agree thanks soccer_ref
BadMagic
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 08:15 PM |
Any salt once you get the numbers into position?
Edit: Wow, post and solve really does work.
jgf
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 08:29 PM |
I've solved enough real life cubes that getting the numbers is not a problem. What to do with them has me stumped.
themajesticmoose
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 08:37 PM |
[14] Seconded.
monocle
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 09:22 PM |
[12] you can mentally disassemble in your mind based on the colors you can see on the three sides.
but I'm with the others that doesn't know what to do with my solved grid
NM: post & solve. wow that was crazy. I think that was an awesome puzzle.
Erich
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 09:28 PM |
[14] [15] My grandfather used to say that everything is relative.
king_neptune
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 09:38 PM |
Wow, definitely not too easy, but nothing too mysterious, just necessary persistence. I hope this doesn't cause a permanent mutation of my brain!
Nice puzzle m-doc!
martinp13
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:45 PM |
[17] I hate to say it, but that's DUH salt.... given the + and -, we already know that? Relative to WHAT is the problem.
uriel_343
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:11 PM |
[19] Agreed
uriel_343
Posted on Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:31 PM |
Finally. You're a very bad man, Murdoctor. Great puzzle. Made me work for it.
Thosw
Posted on Sat Sep 06, 2008 07:07 AM |
Holy cow. Almost 12 hours later and I'm still 56th?
steve
Posted on Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:14 AM |
Excellent puzzle. Don't know why there aren't more solvers except that some people may have been scarred at a young age by the cube.
Do not fear! You don't need to actually solve using the rubik's cube suggested method of spinning the thing!
martinp13
Posted on Sat Sep 06, 2008 05:52 PM |
I still don't get it... I've tried using items, names, nationalities, etc.
gst
Posted on Sun Sep 07, 2008 01:06 PM |
Nice. A fun but not overwhelming challenge.
ninjoo
Posted on Tue Sep 09, 2008 09:26 AM |
Wow...4 days later, and number 89. Nice puzzle, but the hard part for me was figuring out what to do with the numbers since, well, there's like a babillion ways of using numbers like that.
Please login to post