[3] No, just a math wiz! Which I am not even though I have a math minor (from a long time ago). Something tells me I really don't have to be a math wiz, but the sight of integrals makes me sick to the stomach!
Got it the second go-round. I had the right idea the first time but must have messed up somehow ... then I spent a loong time trying to think of something else to do.
Hmmm, this one reminds me a lot of math class - a lot of work, and I always seem to come up with the wrong answer! I tried a lot of things and nothing works - it's all gibberish. I even think I know what the exponents are for, but that's not helping. Any more salt to give?
[13] Not to remind you of math class, but if the variables were Roman alphabet instead of Greek, would that help? (And, of course, everything you do in an equation applies to the "solution", right?)
After completing the two steps using the Wikipedia table for the Greek alphabet, I got close enough that I could guess it, but I think that the Wikipedia table does not use the exact same order as the puzzle author.
I think we all tried to make this a lot harder than it needed to be. I tried shifting the letters both before and after conversion. No shifts are needed.
[20][22] Think inverse tanga number.
27 Comments
threehojos
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:13 PM |
Wha??
ninjoo
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:14 PM |
hehe...nice jab at those disciplines...and there's a lot that can throw you off, but the instructions are there to keep you on track
perihelion
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:19 PM |
My first puzzle. Hope you don't feel you have to be psychic!
epaz
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:31 PM |
Any little bit of salt for the math-challenged?
BigSlick
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:33 PM |
[3] No, just a math wiz! Which I am not even though I have a math minor (from a long time ago). Something tells me I really don't have to be a math wiz, but the sight of integrals makes me sick to the stomach!
scoutmom
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:35 PM |
No, no need for math (thank goodness) other than the usual tanga number application - but remember, it's all Greek to me!
pegasus69
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:36 PM |
[6] All I get is gibberish.
epaz
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:37 PM |
Woohoo! Got it on a guess (and by reading [2])! :-D
But it turns out I was on the right track; I just used the wrong thing for tanga numbering.
jammer1001
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:37 PM |
You solved this puzzle in 28 minutes and 17 seconds and were the 21st Tanga member to solve it.
[3] 1st puzzle? Wow! I'm impressed!
scoutmom
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:37 PM |
Don't apply the exponents too soon.
mnemonica
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:52 PM |
Got it the second go-round. I had the right idea the first time but must have messed up somehow ... then I spent a loong time trying to think of something else to do.
p.s.: Nice puzzle!
cyncat
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 07:59 PM |
Good puzzle! Nice formulas, lol.
BigSlick
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 08:34 PM |
Hmmm, this one reminds me a lot of math class - a lot of work, and I always seem to come up with the wrong answer! I tried a lot of things and nothing works - it's all gibberish. I even think I know what the exponents are for, but that's not helping. Any more salt to give?
perihelion
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 08:54 PM |
[13] Not to remind you of math class, but if the variables were Roman alphabet instead of Greek, would that help? (And, of course, everything you do in an equation applies to the "solution", right?)
martinp13
Posted on Mon Aug 04, 2008 09:51 PM |
Thanks [8] ... got me to re-evaluate and after a few letters saw the answer.
xanadudan
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 04:42 AM |
Wow... 57th after 6 hours! And only by a guess as well...
Irrenarzt
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 07:58 AM |
I got nothing still.
perihelion
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 08:13 AM |
If anyone needs a hint, feel free to TG me.
Spiritwire
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 09:57 AM |
After completing the two steps using the Wikipedia table for the Greek alphabet, I got close enough that I could guess it, but I think that the Wikipedia table does not use the exact same order as the puzzle author.
My first <100 finish in a while... :-)
Quixote171
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:28 AM |
Wow, I haven't got a clue. I had an idea, but it didn't work...
Twench
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:13 AM |
I'm not totally certain that:
de
oz
orx
ub
xm
il
isn't the answer
Irrenarzt
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:23 PM |
[20] I had several ideas, none of them panned out. I've officially given up on this one. I just don't see it.
Twench
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 01:16 PM |
I think we all tried to make this a lot harder than it needed to be. I tried shifting the letters both before and after conversion. No shifts are needed.
[20] [22] Think inverse tanga number.
Irrenarzt
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 02:22 PM |
I got it with a hint from the maker. Had the right method but didn't realize it. Just goes to show you can't trust an anagram site.
Good puzzle.
dajagr
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 03:43 PM |
85 with four letters and an extrapolation.
quantumplation
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 04:50 PM |
in many ways, that took me way too long to figure out.
travelocity
Posted on Tue Aug 05, 2008 04:51 PM |
[5] Look at the integral again. It comes out to 0, easy-peasy.
Please login to post