Cryptopix

Instructions

Cryptopix puzzles are solved by putting the pictures together to form a word or phrase! For a better idea on how to solve this puzzle see an example

Cryptopix

jami1kenob

wants to try to stump you with this puzzle that was published on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:00 PM

You must be a Tanga member to play. Please either log in or sign up!

30 Comments

Refresh comments

spoofme

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:02 PM |

[1] ur a chtr!

Ragspur

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:05 PM |

Nice puzzle!

slog

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:07 PM |

[1] Alas! I have been censored!

tangarific

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:08 PM |

I've lost my entire paycheck ever since I did this :)

metafor

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:08 PM |

nice one!

mhuber

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:12 PM |

Thought I had it but apparently not. Any help?

pandapal

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:13 PM |

I'm really not seeing this one tonight....... :-(

scoutmom

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:14 PM |

You need to come up with what and where.

sdharing

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:15 PM |

Wow . . . 39 people got it so far, so it must be me. I don't even know where to start.

I can assume the dashed line is there for a reason. Is the fact that there are 27 dashes important?

tangarific

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:18 PM |

[10] The number of dashes is not important.

scoutmom

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:18 PM |

The number of dashes are not important. But perhaps you might want to call it something besides a "dashed line"

brainybroad

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:19 PM |

[10] the number of dashes is irrelevant.

sdharing

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:21 PM |

[12] Thanks. That gave it to me immediately.

But it points out a problem -- it *is* a dashed line (or, perhaps, a hyphened line). For it to be some other kind of line, it would have to be made up of some other thing.

So, a mild boo on this one.

steph_frolin

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 08:02 PM |

Well it isn't "..." Edited for perceived saltiness, post and solve strikes again
EDIT - [1] I was wondering when someone would reference that method.

scoutmom

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:23 PM |

[14] I agree. But I think that for most people, when you refer to it, that's what most people call it.

slog

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:25 PM |

[14] I agree as well. That is definitely the wrong kind of line.

mhuber

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 07:30 PM |

*sigh* Still lost:(

loooney2ns

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 08:03 PM |

I'm stumped

mattlscc

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 08:40 PM |

I saw the movie Hancock recently... the title character, John, was really pretty funny. Good puzzle.
____________________
http://tvharddrive.com/

jfro

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 08:46 PM |

wow way after the fact and still 99... toughie

Chupper

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 09:22 PM |

thanks [14] and [20] that line really dashed my hopes for solving without salt, you guys helped me dot the i's and cross the t's

JohnQ118

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 09:40 PM |

[19] i'm on line behind you.

barbed_oracle

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 09:48 PM |

Finally I didn't need to know what some "famous" person looks line! Great puzzle!

pandapal

Posted on Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:59 PM |

Finally got it with some of the salt here. I was trying to figure out what the guy on the bike was doing.....

martinp13

Posted on Sun Aug 24, 2008 07:06 AM |

Wow... the answer is simple, but there's way too much going on with the bike guy. Just look at the forest there, not the trees. And I agree with the line comments: that's just the wrong thing to put there.