Our customers say Excellent
4.53
out of 5 based on
76079
reviews
Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5
2760 customer reviews
5 Stars
63%
4 Stars
10%
3 Stars
8%
2 Stars
7%
1 Stars
12%

Filtered to: 4 Star Ratings

Chilibreath


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Top quality material

As always Levis leads the pack in both quality and attention to detail, but it has taken me several purchases to realize the 505 Regular Fit is not quite my cup of tea, they are too narrow in the leg and they work their way down from the hip too much. They look good and are well made, but I now know I want a looser fit, which I will get. In the meantime the material is so solid they won't wear out soon! You get what you pay for with Levi's, just be very sure of what you want.


JerryA


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Twisted leg

I love my 505 dark stone washed but I have to buy like 5 or 6 pairs to get 2 that the left leg isn't twisted for some reason. I love so I'll just keep on sending back the ones that are not made correctly.


Whamdaddy


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Great jeans with one exception

Love the jeans, but the fit on the 33x34 are bigger on me than the same ones I bought earlier this year in a 34x34 size. Something is amiss... There seems to be a quality control issue somewhere along the line.


FatMatt


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Mixed emotion - Love the jeans but not the short pockets

I will only wear Levi's jeans and have recently switched back to 505s. I found two pair that fit perfectly, bought them, wore them for a few weeks and decided to go and buy two more. I found that everything that was on the shelf in the same size had extremely short front pockets. I have run into this a few times and it is annoying, to say the least. Are we marketing these to people who have baby hands or to people who do not have anything to carry in their pockets? Levi's, what is the story with these short pockets? Please fix it soon or I will have to find a new jean to wear. Sincerely, A guy who needs to carry things in his pockets


FryerTuck


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Nice to find length I need

Can't find the long sizes in stores so it's nice to find on your website. The waist is a bit smaller than the exact same size I try on at the store, though. Love the sturdy, no nonsense look and feel of Levi's and I've worn them for years. If these last, I’ll continue to buy them online.



Susan17


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Jeans

My only issue was the picture being stone wash really was alot darker when I received them Other than that they fit perfect.


GramE3042


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Levi's are first choice

Getting harder and harder to find good quality. Even in Levi's jeans. Ordering directly from you helps. Better material and workmanship than those purchased from other stores. Sad that is true.


Sacred


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
Waist is a tiny bit small

Great jeans. Just the waist is generally small. All though I am generally used to wearing baggy jeans or dress pants. So it could just be me. But make sure you try them on in a store before buying them. Great jeans either way.


devery


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
They take some breaking in.

After wearing a couple of times they feel better but I could barely put them on the 1st time.


RIFF


Third Party Review
Reviewed: 2024-08-18
NOT the original 505's ! Why the changes ?

I bought my 1st pair of Levi's in 1953 and have worn only Levi's since. I switched to 505's because I liked the zipper. They are the only pants I wear; period ! Just bought 2 new pair of 505 regular,rigid. Listed below are the changes I do not like. 1. Only 5 belt loops (for 63 years there were 7) 2. The front pockets are not as deep. 3. Somehow the legs are not the same ? I have always ironed a crease in the legs by folding the leg with the seams together,and ironing them. Did this to my new ones, put them on and the crease is NOT straight down the front of your leg. Very unhappy that you say they are the same as 1967, because they are NOT.


Track A Package
Issue(s) With An Order
Warranty FAQ
customer service

Have questions? We're here to help!